3 ms·
I don't have any different sources. I read them differently. You read "the US made plans to make/support relebellion and the sectarian aspect". I read "the Syr
by AnAfrican 11y ago
I don't have any different sources. I read them differently.
You read "the US made plans to make/support relebellion and the sectarian aspect".
I read "the Syran regime already has these vulnerabilities that could get exploited"
Probably because I don't believe in an all-powerful US.
>PLAY ON SUNNI FEARS OF IRANIAN INFLUENCE: There are fears
in Syria that the Iranians are active in both Shia
proselytizing and conversion of, mostly poor, Sunnis. Though
often exaggerated, such fears reflect an element of the Sunni
community in Syria that is increasingly upset by and focused
on the spread of Iranian influence in their country through
activities ranging from mosque construction to business.
> There
is also tremendous fear in the Alawite community about
retribution if the Sunni majority ever regains power.
> DIVISIONS IN THE MILITARY-SECURITY SERVICES: Bashar
constantly guards against challenges from those with ties
inside the military and security services.
> THE ECONOMY: Perpetually under-performing, the Syrian
economy creates jobs for less than 50 percent of the
country,s university graduates. Oil accounts for 70 percent
of exports and 30 percent of government revenue, but
production is in steady decline. By 2010 Syria is expected
to become a net importer of oil. Few experts believe the
SARG is capable of managing successfully the expected
economic dislocations.
- acqq 11y ago> I read "the Syran regime already has these vulnerabilities that could get exploited" By the US (interested in removing Assad because of military supremacy), Saudis and Turkey ("our best allies," Sunnis to overcome "wrong believing" Assad). As planned since 2006. The "rebellion" was mostly a Sunni extremist (as in, radicalized by the Saudi paid preachers) rebellion in the Sunni majority places, supported by the players above. Turkey was also strongly radicalized in the last few decades, also a lot of oil money. The US had also the "democracy" babble like that in Libya (supporting Al-Qaeda!) or Egypt ("but Muslim Brotherhood are our guys", we "really don't understand" why they turned Islamic, we don't read what they write, they told us it's democracy what they want). And the Iraq war was also to "bring democracy." It's hard to close the eyes so much. If I understand, you have no sources for your initial claim: > Assad did voluntarily release some Jihadists in order to exarcerbate the sectarian aspect of the conflict That goal would be more than counterproductive. The "rebels" are almost in Damascus, threatening him. That he did some prisoner exchange or tried to appease the protest, I can imagine.