3 ms·
A human on mars could certainly have covered more territory than the robots did, but the expense would have been several orders of magnitude more. Had those bi
by ricree 17y ago
A human on mars could certainly have covered more territory than the robots did, but the expense would have been several orders of magnitude more.
Had those billions been spent on robotic explorers, they would also have outperformed the relatively cheap robots that we actually have on the surface.