3 ms·
To clarify what I meant by those outlandish figures that have no real ground in reality (I made them ridiculously big to make that obvious): If phone manufactu
by VeejayRampay 11y ago
To clarify what I meant by those outlandish figures that have no real ground in reality (I made them ridiculously big to make that obvious):
If phone manufacturers were to insure that the materials have no "human or environmental cost" attached to them, the price would have to increase significantly (unless I'm missing some key aspects of the manufacturing process). I am not sure consumers are ready to play their part and make up for that price increase. See fair-trade/organic food, which have not yet achieved the kind of scale that would drive the costs down. If you know for a fact that changing the process in a more humane/responsible/sustainable way doesn't have to mean dramatically increased end prices, please do share, it'd be good news for me.
- obsurveyor 11y agoThis is called wanting to have your cake and eat it too. Currently consumers in the Western world are doing it at the cost of child/third world labor. Apple's surely got some margin to cover some of it but why shouldn't prices go up to reflect it? Companies don't have a right to succeed. If the consumer won't play their part then Apple will have to adjust their devices and software to get to a price point consumers will pay. The yearly device model of business is incredibly wasteful and maybe it should go away.