3 ms·
Hi, thanks for the feedback. There are three main points that makes me believe that the clusters aren't artificial: the first one is that I've made the clusters
by perone 11y ago
Hi, thanks for the feedback. There are three main points that makes me believe that the clusters aren't artificial: the first one is that I've made the clusters with DBSCAN on the original data (100-d word vectors) and not after the t-SNE embedding. The second point is that I manually inspected some clusters and they make sense when compared to the similarity queries on the word2vec model (take a look on the star names for instance). The third point: I took the folios from the two main clusters (red/blue) (https://www.reddit.com/r/MachineLearning/comments/419e5a/voynich_manuscript_word_vectors_and_tsne/cz0nwlw https://www.reddit.com/r/MachineLearning/comments/419e5a/voy...) and they seem to match with the folios from the two languages hypothesis.