3 ms·
I wonder why guitars don't have f-holes as well?
by test1235 11y ago
I wonder why guitars don't have f-holes as well?
- 20after4 11y agosome do: https://www.google.com/search?q=guitar+f-holes&safe=off&source=lnms&tbm=isch https://www.google.com/search?q=guitar+f-holes&safe=off&sour...
- dsego 11y agoArchtop guitars usually do.
- spdionis 11y agoSemi-acoustic guitars always do.
- oDot 11y agoThe Gibson ES-335 has f-holes. These guitars were famously used by BB King, his own named Lucille. When Gibson made a signature model he asked to remove the f-holes to reduce feedback: > The most noticeable differences between the Lucille and the Gibson ES-355TD-SV on which it is based are the "Lucille" script on the headstock, the maple neck, and the lack of F-holes on the top. King requested that, to reduce feedback, there be no F-holes. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lucille_%28guitar%29 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lucille_%28guitar%29 There's a very good song by him talking about Lucille: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Y8QxOjuYHg https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Y8QxOjuYHg
- beat 11y agoThe ES335 is a "semi-hollow", with a solid block of wood running from the neck to the bridge.
- falcolas 11y agoSome do, but the bodies of guitars (with the exception of archtops) are built differently from violins. Namely, the top and bottom of a violin are carved (the thickness ranges between 3 and 8mm), whereas the guitar has a mostly uniform thin (0.5 - 1mm) sheet of hardwood with support bars. One of the big reasons for the different style of top is that a bowed violin string produces much stronger vibrations than a plucked guitar string, so the body of a guitar must amplify the sound much more than the body of a violin.
- beat 11y agoArchtop guitars with carved tops usually do. Flat-top acoustic guitars have a complex bracing system that would get in the way of F-holes (nylon string guitars are usually fan-braced, and steel string guitars, with more tension, are X-braced).