4 ms·
Ok, so you freely admit that there are (probably) things that are wrong with it if you looked hard enough. ...So why isn't it better? EDIT TO ADD: You know, t
by ThinkWriteMute 17y ago
Ok, so you freely admit that there are (probably) things that are wrong with it if you looked hard enough.
...So why isn't it better?
EDIT TO ADD: You know, this is really part of the bigger problem. Google has a fair amount of side services that just barely scoot by and it's pretty stupid. Example: Google is a search engine company, but their Chrome Extension Search page HAS NO SEARCH FEATURES.
- scott_s 17y agoResponding to "It could probably improve, but I haven't looked closely" with "Why isn't it better?" is nonsensical to me. He just said he hadn't analyzed it - and that he didn't feel the need to.
- btilly 17y agoAll software could be better. No matter how good it is you can find things to improve about it. As for Google's software, a lot of people at Google fully agree with the startup idea that you should release something fast then iterate. That means that we release a lot of stuff that (quite deliberately) doesn't have a lot of corporate spit and polish. And things that don't come to our attention as seriously needing improvement are liable to remain unimproved. If you think that something particularly needs improvement, send feedback.
- ThinkWriteMute 17y agoI don't care about initial spit and shine. Really I don't. As soon as Chrome came out I downloaded it and used it even when it didn't have Adblock. But Blogger has been out for a looooong time.