6 ms·
Unfortunately, as I wrote in the commit message which spawned this thread, this just encourages people to write more buggy programs.
by cperciva 11y ago
Unfortunately, as I wrote in the commit message which spawned this thread, this just encourages people to write more buggy programs.
- pcwalton 11y agoOr, more likely, it just encourages customers to abandon your alternative C library in favor of glibc to avoid breaking configure scripts (which is what forced musl's hand). I definitely think you're right in principle, but I can't blame musl's author for bowing to market pressure any more than I can blame Intel for sticking to x86 backwards compatibility.