4 ms·
Seems way harder for way lower returns to recover the second stage. Only 1 engine instead of 9, and you're recovering from orbital velocity which opens up seve
by jbooth 11y ago
Seems way harder for way lower returns to recover the second stage. Only 1 engine instead of 9, and you're recovering from orbital velocity which opens up several new cans of worms. Would they need heat shielding? The extra weight there might blow away any cost savings from recovering the engine.
- jadyoyster 11y agoHeat shielding is needed, as well as extra landing engines that work outside of vacuum, since the second stage engine would destroy itself under atmospheric pressure. It's easy to see how quickly you start to get dimishing returns, but it would be cool if they could pull it off.
- avmich 11y agoSome experiments were done in early 2000 with inflatable aerobrake. The concept was shown to work, but experiments weren't a complete success. However this technology I'm sure can be applied to the task of returning the second stage. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atmospheric_entry#Inflatable_heat_shield_reentry https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atmospheric_entry#Inflatable_h...
- raducu 11y agoOr even more futuristic, plasma parachute/heat shield: http://www.nasa.gov/offices/oct/early_stage_innovation/niac/2012_phase_I_fellows_kirtley.html http://www.nasa.gov/offices/oct/early_stage_innovation/niac/...