4 ms·

They want to use this tech to eventually land rockets on other planets so the rocket needs to be able to land upright. Short term it might be easier to land on

They want to use this tech to eventually land rockets on other planets so the rocket needs to be able to land upright. Short term it might be easier to land on inflatables but they're looking at the bigger picture.

jsumrall 11y ago
No, its just not possible to maintain the integrity of the rocket if you're going to somehow lay it down on an inflatable. How could an inflatable withstand the temperature of the firing engines?
- gbhn 11y ago
  For weight, the sides of a rocket are very thin. Think tin can. Vertical is OK but horizontal can't work.
  - delecti 11y ago
    Which makes sense. It's designed specifically to withstand a huge amount of vertical stress.
el_zorro 11y ago
The utility here is not really landing on other planets, but instead the order of magnitude decrease in launch costs if they don't have to build a new first stage for every launch.
- dchesterton 11y ago
  This could theoretically be achieved by either means. The question was specifically why a vertical landing is favoured over a cushioned inflatable landing. Musk has stated in the past that they're looking to eventually use this tech to create rockets which can be used on Mars, hence why parachutes and inflatables are out of the question.
  - ansible 11y ago
    Parachutes also have the problem that you can't as easily control the landing point.