3 ms·
I don't have time to look at this carefully, but this has to be a dissection fallacy like the ol' "64=65" one. For geometric examples, see http://mathworld.wol
by henning 19y ago
I don't have time to look at this carefully, but this has to be a dissection fallacy like the ol' "64=65" one.
For geometric examples, see http://mathworld.wolfram.com/DissectionFallacy.html http://mathworld.wolfram.com/DissectionFallacy.html .
- hhm 19y agoNo, it's not the dissection fallacy, it's a different trick. I gave some details on another post on this thread...