3 ms·
I completely agree, but sadly, I don't think this will happen before countless people are thrown in jail for breaking them.
by olliesaunders 17y ago
I completely agree, but sadly, I don't think this will happen before countless people are thrown in jail for breaking them.
- eru 17y agoAnd you won't get complete lack of privacy anytime soon. Selective privacy is what we face.
- calcnerd256 17y agoHow can we then tip from one equilibrium to the other?
- eru 17y agoInteresting question. But --- do we want to?
- calcnerd256 17y agoIs the move Pareto-optimal?
- randallsquared 17y agoMillions of people are currently in jail for breaking useless laws, and spreading understanding of that may be the best way to stop it.
- orborde 17y agoBear in mind that most of those are drug-related. Stuff that the people involved are well aware is illegal. This means that our prison populations are not really good examples to wield in the service of reducing the number of obscure laws that could be used to convict anyone at any time.