> Occams's Razor precisely why i find hancock's model more compelling. it better fits occam's razor. if you look at the models in more detail, the bugs become

> Occams's Razor precisely why i find hancock's model more compelling. it better fits occam's razor. if you look at the models in more detail, the bugs become obvious > trumps any vague theories about comets the evidence is mounting & more attention is being paid. like software, social,geological,archaeological,etc models are a developed system. studies are being conducted that show things like a layer of nanodiamonds across "50 million square kilometers across the Northern Hemisphere at the Younger Dryas boundary". here are some models that were once "vague", "woo", "controversial" the earth being 4.5 billion years old, plate tetonics, the earth orbiting the sun. > But the archaeological evidence is looking pretty good at present funny how all sides declare victory with their "evidence" ;-) http://www.theironsamurai.com/2015/10/03/clovis-comet/ http://www.theironsamurai.com/2015/10/03/clovis-comet/ http://www.news.ucsb.edu/2014/014368/nanodiamonds-are-forever http://www.news.ucsb.edu/2014/014368/nanodiamonds-are-foreve... http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2013/09/130910-comet-impact-mammoths-climate-younger-dryas-quebec-science/ http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2013/09/130910-comet... note the "absence of a crater" is explained by the comet impacting the ice cap (a thick layer of ice) during the younger dryas period. seems worthy of consideration... i encourage you to look into the methodology of radio carbon dating & other technologies; also look into the advantages/disadvantages of each technology...