If there is no risk of surveillance or lock-in, he'd probably be ok? After all, "cloud" is a pretty ill-defined term. He certainly doesn't object to things bec

If there is no risk of surveillance or lock-in, he'd probably be ok? After all, "cloud" is a pretty ill-defined term. He certainly doesn't object to things because someone calls them "cloud-something", but because of the power structure they entail--which happens to include stuff such as surveillance and lock-in with a lot of the stuff that's currently being sold as "cloud services".