> Interestingly, those same people are now contending for just 2MB... Hearn mentions the backstory behind this in a comment here [0], posted a little while aft

> Interestingly, those same people are now contending for just 2MB... Hearn mentions the backstory behind this in a comment here [0], posted a little while after you posted your comment. After reading his comment, does the shift from 20MB max blocks to something smaller become less "interesting" and more understandable? If not, why not? Edit: Additionally, do you have anything to say about this comment? [1] [0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10921219 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10921219 [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10921209 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10921209