> 3. '3 ^ 4 ^ 5' parses to '3 ^ (4 ^ 5)'. I actually think that a trained mathematician would have no idea what to do with 3 ^ 4 ^ 5. It's a completely ambigu

> 3. '3 ^ 4 ^ 5' parses to '3 ^ (4 ^ 5)'. I actually think that a trained mathematician would have no idea what to do with 3 ^ 4 ^ 5. It's a completely ambiguous statement and has no proper mathematical parsing.