5 ms·
In what ways do you find SyncThing lacking when compared to BTSync? I started using it for work (cautiously) a couple of moths ago and have found it to be very
by bcrack 11y ago
In what ways do you find SyncThing lacking when compared to BTSync? I started using it for work (cautiously) a couple of moths ago and have found it to be very similar (with respect to stability and ease of use) with BTSync, if not superior. Note though that I haven't used BTSync since its first days.
- artlogic 11y agoMy guess is this: > I was able to share 15 GBs of vacation videos with 10 of my non-techie friends by sending them a read only key to a shared folder. All of them got it right away with no technical questions or issues. I appreciate SyncThing's security first stance, but it would be incredibly helpful if it was a bit easier to share specific synced things with non-techies.
- Liru 11y agoThis is the one thing that I was looking for in an alternative to Sync. It made me sad that the main alternative to it didn't have this.
- baldfat 11y ago1) Punching holes through Firewalls - BTSync has the strong upper hand for that. 2) Much easier share structure. Synchthing still feels very fiddly compared to BTSync I had a large corporate job that BTSync would do but I dug in my heels and tried out SynchThing and I had to buy licences for BTSync. It is working out very well.
- autoreleasepool 11y agoThe exceptional mobile app (iOS client) is the platform's killer feature IMO. A lot of folks use their phones as their main computer outside of work these days. I couldn't find an equivalent for SyncThing. Aside from that what I really like about it is: - consistent UI across platforms - unlimited folders - free - Web GUI for FreeNAS plugin is excellent - local downloads on the same network are FAST - share keys without needing approval - BitTorrent protocol - "It just works" (it really does) I have no experience with SyncThing. But to me, open source is the only thing SyncThing has going for it over BTSync. At least on paper.