I should have been more precise in the article. Here: A system which uses an adaptive hash function like bcrypt is ~6 orders of magnitude less effed in the eve

I should have been more precise in the article. Here: A system which uses an adaptive hash function like bcrypt is ~6 orders of magnitude less effed in the event of a compromised database than a system which uses a standard hash algorithm and a salt, ceteris paribus. I would hope you agree that those ~6 orders of magnitude could well be the difference between "not noticeably effed" and "profoundly effed."