3 ms·
This looks amazing - it looks like wx with better documentation, and Qt without the MOC garbage.
by analognoise 11y ago
This looks amazing - it looks like wx with better documentation, and Qt without the MOC garbage.
- FraaJad 11y agoThe code looks nicer compared to both wx and Qt.. but looks worse than Qt even on Windows.
- mwcampbell 11y agoA crucial downside compared to wx is that U++ doesn't use native widgets, at least on Windows. And unlike Qt, it doesn't implement platform accessibility APIs. This is a show-stopper for blind users, because their screen readers can't identify the types of the widgets, tell which one has keyboard focus, etc.
- lultimouomo 11y agoI haven't dug seriously into it, but I think Qt has decent accessibility support: http://doc.qt.io/qt-5/accessible.html http://doc.qt.io/qt-5/accessible.html
- mwcampbell 11y agoMy mistake. You're right, Qt does implement accessibility. Fixed in the comment.