4 ms·
Re: "Economic Inequality". I tend to read with a charitable eye, so I don't take the same meaning as yourself. But, he's chosen an expression that allows a lot
by rukuu001 11y ago
Re: "Economic Inequality".
I tend to read with a charitable eye, so I don't take the same meaning as yourself. But, he's chosen an expression that allows a lot of interpretation.
The way I read it, I assume we're talking about a cohort, and the point is, on average, the least lazy of the cohort will probably do better.
- ZeroGravitas 11y agoThe least lazy lottery players win more? The least lazy people participating in a ponzi scheme get more money? Obviously not, so what you're assuming and/or implying is that life is fair, that the rich deserve their success and the poor are lazy, which is exactly the point people are arguing, so you're begging the question.