3 ms·
I'm all for cutting out the no-reply addresses, but this doesn't seem like the best example. The email is an automated response saying that the sender's address
by cduan 17y ago
I'm all for cutting out the no-reply addresses, but this doesn't seem like the best example. The email is an automated response saying that the sender's address could not be verified, so the message was ignored. If the sender replied to it, then the email would just come from the same sender address, which would still be unverifiable, and then what?
I suppose they could set the reply address to some generic support location. But in that case, the best solution would have been to forward the initial (and unverifiable) email to the support location in the first place.
- eoge 17y agoHi. I agree it's not the best example. But it's not an automatic reply. It's happened a few times with different people signing the mail but most importantly, the e-mail address is verified, it just wasn't the address connected with the specific billing enquiry I made. Also, the original mail was sent to their generic support address, as requested on their site (last paragraph): http://aws.amazon.com/tax-help/ http://aws.amazon.com/tax-help/