> It's good to remind developers that they should ensure that their products degrade gracefully I agree! I don't think it's a bad reminder, I think it just rub

> It's good to remind developers that they should ensure that their products degrade gracefully I agree! I don't think it's a bad reminder, I think it just rubbed me the wrong way that he seems to present this whole concept like something new and novel, when frankly, it's just...not. The entire blog post doesn't have a single mention of either "graceful degradation" or "progressive enhancement," both of which would be useful to hear if a reader wasn't familiar and wanted to learn more about this topic.