3 ms·
But he never correctly identifies the problem; he doesn't spend any time on the problem. He simply shoos us away from inequality, which given his income bracke
by david927 11y ago
But he never correctly identifies the problem; he doesn't spend any time on the problem. He simply shoos us away from inequality, which given his income bracket smacks of conflict-of-interest.
- joelrunyon 11y agoHe can be corrective without having to identify it himself. Just because he explains that something isn't the problem, doesn't mean he's obligated to identify all the root causes himself. He's simply pointing out a flaw in people's logical processes.
- david927 11y agoHe can be corrective without having to identify it himself. Can he? Because the last I looked, he has failed so dramatically in whatever he was trying to do that now that not only has he been vilified, lacerated and destroyed in the press -- but inequality is even more on the radar than it was before.