It doesn't help that the WP article basically attacked pg's article with the usual inflammatory crap. It's easy to argue that pg kind of missed the point by car

It doesn't help that the WP article basically attacked pg's article with the usual inflammatory crap. It's easy to argue that pg kind of missed the point by caring too much about his source of inequality (productive creativity), and not enough about the primary source of inequality (rent-seeking). The article was unnecessarily and unfairly inflammatory about it.