5 ms·
IMO, the "Dear Github" open letter is a constructive way to call attention to the perceived problems I agree entirety. The responses are fanboy trash in a "us
by forgottenpass 11y ago
IMO, the "Dear Github" open letter is a constructive way to call attention to the perceived problems
I agree entirety. The responses are fanboy trash in a "using my serious voice" wrapper.
I don't use github enough to share the gripes in "Dear GitHub." They seemed kinda minor and I understand why they wouldn't be in the product. But in light of the poor communication from GitHub explained in the letter, it seemed like a perfectly reasonable and polite step to try and open a channel of communication.
- stcredzero 11y agoI don't use github enough to share the gripes in "Dear GitHub." They seemed kinda minor and I understand why they wouldn't be in the product. What about implementing an API to let other people implement some of the needed features?
- forgottenpass 11y agoSure, that's a possible solution. I wasn't trying to convey a position that something shouldn't be done, I'm just expressing that I understand the wide breadth of possibilities for why it hadn't been done.
- carussell 11y agoI agree with the point, too, but statements like this are not conducive to good discussion and are not the kind of thing I look forward to reading on HN: > The responses are fanboy trash in a "using my serious voice" wrapper"