I feel like the first third or fourth of this article was just completely missing or something. So much of the context and intention of the article was just nev

I feel like the first third or fourth of this article was just completely missing or something. So much of the context and intention of the article was just never explained or introduced at all. In particular, it starts talking about Casper as if the reader is sure to know who or what that is, but I had to Google it. I still don't know why the article chose to fixate on Casper in particular.