> The idea that hard forks are dangerous or irresponsible is a belief that is not well supported bip99 - https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0099.m

> The idea that hard forks are dangerous or irresponsible is a belief that is not well supported bip99 - https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0099.mediawiki https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0099.mediawi... https://www.reddit.com/r/bitcoinxt/comments/3t21dh/dangerous_homebrew_cryptography_in_blockstream/cx586r1 https://www.reddit.com/r/bitcoinxt/comments/3t21dh/dangerous... https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/3griiv/on_consensus_and_forks_by_mike_hearn/cu0yv0r https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/3griiv/on_consensu... > scare people away from doing what's necessary Most block size hard-forks can be deployed as a soft-fork. "It's necessary" is highly contentious and you have failed to cite any of the arguments you disagree with- you're wasting everyone's time.