3 ms·
Very similar to my experience. A multitude of features I would never want to use, partly out of doubt (security, stability, etc). My primary need was native
by Jedd 11y ago
Very similar to my experience. A multitude of features I would never want to use, partly out of doubt (security, stability, etc).
My primary need was native (robust, sane, GUI-driven) iSCSI presentation ... which it completely failed to provide out of the box. That is, with a single iSCSI target, any significant activity over a GbE link would cause the QNap to crash. QNap support guided me towards a beta release of their software -- this solved the immediate problem, but I've never felt comfy upgrading (a one way process) from that release for fear of breaking iSCSI or other basic features. A less than ideal situation.