3 ms·

So which combinations of mutations cause cancer then? Replace BRAF in my pseudo-equations above with "combination of mutations".

by nonbel 11y ago

danieltillett 11y ago
There are hundreds of thousands of mutation combinations that lead to cancer. This is why it is such a difficult problem.
- nonbel 11y ago
  Has anyone done a proof of principle though. You only need to test one of the combinations. I don't think anyone has been able to do this.
  - danieltillett 11y ago
    This is a good question for which I don’t have the answer. We know from epidemiological research that you need at least 5 independent mutations to get to metastatic cancer. With the new CRISPR technology it should now be possible to make cells containing just 5 mutations which should then be able to be studied. The bigger problem is these 5 mutations can be drawn from hundreds of possible genes so the combinations are almost endless.
    - nonbel 11y ago
      >"We know from epidemiological research that you need at least 5 independent mutations to get to metastatic cancer." This is all based on the Armitage and Doll 1954 theory, they write: "This result will be valid for large values of t (of the order of a human lifetime) provided that p_l x t, P_2 x t, ..., p_r x t are all sufficiently small (as could be assumed in an application of this theory to human cancer)" http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2007940/ http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2007940/ Here, the "the probability of occurrence of the r-th change, in that line of descent, is p, per unit time [t]". So obviously if p or t is large enough, the probability of dying from cancer goes above 1, which is non-physical. There is a simplification being made here that was reasonable in the pre-computer age. What happens if you implement the same theory without that simplification?

3 ms·

So which combinations of mutations cause cancer then? Replace BRAF in my pseudo-equations above with "combination of mutations".

by nonbel 11y ago

So which combinations of mutations cause cancer then? Replace BRAF in my pseudo-equations above with "combination of mutations".

danieltillett 11y ago
There are hundreds of thousands of mutation combinations that lead to cancer. This is why it is such a difficult problem.
- nonbel 11y ago
  Has anyone done a proof of principle though. You only need to test one of the combinations. I don't think anyone has been able to do this.
  - danieltillett 11y ago
    This is a good question for which I don’t have the answer. We know from epidemiological research that you need at least 5 independent mutations to get to metastatic cancer. With the new CRISPR technology it should now be possible to make cells containing just 5 mutations which should then be able to be studied. The bigger problem is these 5 mutations can be drawn from hundreds of possible genes so the combinations are almost endless.
    - nonbel 11y ago
      >"We know from epidemiological research that you need at least 5 independent mutations to get to metastatic cancer." This is all based on the Armitage and Doll 1954 theory, they write: "This result will be valid for large values of t (of the order of a human lifetime) provided that p_l x t, P_2 x t, ..., p_r x t are all sufficiently small (as could be assumed in an application of this theory to human cancer)" http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2007940/ http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2007940/ Here, the "the probability of occurrence of the r-th change, in that line of descent, is p, per unit time [t]". So obviously if p or t is large enough, the probability of dying from cancer goes above 1, which is non-physical. There is a simplification being made here that was reasonable in the pre-computer age. What happens if you implement the same theory without that simplification?