6 ms·
What an incredibly passive aggressive, rude, thinly veiled 'fuck you' of a blog post. Does this guy actually work for GitHub? I am sufficiently offended by the
by aaronbrethorst 11y ago
What an incredibly passive aggressive, rude, thinly veiled 'fuck you' of a blog post. Does this guy actually work for GitHub?
I am sufficiently offended by the tenor of this post to consider taking my private repos off GitHub and move them to BitBucket. And, given that my employer already uses JIRA for issue tracking, I'll probably suggest we consider moving our organization's repos over to BitBucket while we're at it, too.
Edit: Julian doesn't work for GitHub. He works for Chef: https://github.com/juliandunn https://github.com/juliandunn, and his blog post is incredibly poorly worded. Fwiw, if this is what Chef's product people are like, I will never consider working there.
- teckii 11y agoAgreed. He works for Chef.io though, so those who are concerned about his response should consider what relies on Chef, not GitHub. There are many open source CI platforms available so it shouldn't be difficult. Even if he did work for GH, they haven't published an initial response, so your actions would be spontaneous.
- aaronbrethorst 11y agoI noted this in the edit to my post that I posted just before your comment was written (you were probably writing this when I posted my change). Given the sort of 'distributed' nature, and low managerial overhead of GitHub, this could well be considered a "they" post were it from a GitHub employee.
- xirdstl 11y agoHe doesn't work for GitHub, but I agree with your assessment of the tone and wording of this post.
- raarts 11y ago+1