3 ms·
MAC addresses your later concerns. The fact Arch does not support MAC at all then becomes somewhat of a problem, but it is already a huge problem to begin with.
by zanny 11y ago
MAC addresses your later concerns. The fact Arch does not support MAC at all then becomes somewhat of a problem, but it is already a huge problem to begin with.
You can simply make SELinux / Apparmor profiles that default-restrict applications to ~/.config/<appname> and ~/.local/share/<appname> with quotas. Applications that need exceptions would be shipped with apparmor or selinux profile files to amend that.
Its also how you can make desktop Linux a lot more sophisticated in permissions management for applications. I know Apparmor at least supports the idea of network, peripheral, and display access in the same way it controls directory access. It would be a huge usability and security boon to the Linux desktop to have notifications of requests to access resources when an application does so - I think Android 6 is absolutely going in the right direction on application control, and adopting those ideas would be valuable.
- vram22 11y agoInteresting, thanks. Will check out those topics. Agree on the general point of the security benefits.
- vram22 11y ago>MAC addresses your later concerns. What's MAC,, in the context I wrote about? Googled a bit, being a common acronym as well as abbreviation for Macintosh makes it difficult to find the right links.
- vram22 11y agoOk, never mind, found it under Wikipedia link for AppArmor: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mandatory_access_control https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mandatory_access_control