Well, hacker is part of the issue. I guess he hacked the check system, but not the market in any meaningful way. Like I said, he followed his gut, which is a st

Well, hacker is part of the issue. I guess he hacked the check system, but not the market in any meaningful way. Like I said, he followed his gut, which is a strategy employed by millions, with comparable results. The misleading part of the title (to which "hacker" contributed) is that it looks like he succeeded, and thus that one could learn from reading the article. It's a very debatable point, I guess... No offense intended to the submitter.