Heh, the last sentence is debatable (as demonstrated). But to debate it misses the wider point of the first sentence: > "The folly of BitCoin is to believe tha

Heh, the last sentence is debatable (as demonstrated). But to debate it misses the wider point of the first sentence: > "The folly of BitCoin is to believe that technical problems are somehow orthogonal to social problems." This. Or, to restate it, to mistake social solutions to 'money' as technical problems that need fixing.