4 ms·
I'm not sure how this would change the gap between top schools and super top schools. Most of the top students at A tier schools already applied and got rejecte
by kevhsu 11y ago
I'm not sure how this would change the gap between top schools and super top schools. Most of the top students at A tier schools already applied and got rejected by S tier schools in the current environment. So the quality of students theoretically doesn't change. What am I missing in your logic here?
- browseatwork 11y agoStudents who got into S schools would have even more reason to go to them over A tier schools. All students would have even more reason to apply to S tier schools. A tier schools, who depend more on tuition dollars and would need to charge or find other sources of funding (likely without much success- governments have been cutting funding for decades, they're all already tapping private sources as much as they can). S tier schools would become comparably less desirable. This loop would continue (other than schools who try not to charge but depend on tuition dollars falling into the A range).
- browseatwork 11y ago"S tier schools would become comparably less desirable." I meant A tier schools.