7 ms·

Here's the photos. Just because a few weren't working (or real) doesn't mean they have no footage: http://www.sfgate.com/news/article/Photos-released-of-suspec

• jheriko 11y ago
  sure, they mention in the article that they have photos, but the message i got from the article is that having the cameras be real would somehow be of benefit because they help you track down the criminals. to me, it seems very doubtful that the argument presented has any merit. they are described as a 'security gap' in the title and repeatedly in the article, but the evidence supporting that viewpoint is entirely absent. (i should clarify that its not a worthless argument, just the example used to present it contains evidence only for the counter-argument as far as i can see)
• some-guy 11y ago
  That wasn't taken from a train camera however. I ride BART every day and have always wondered if the train cameras are even in use most of the time. I suspected not, and this news story confirms my suspicion.