3 ms·

Disappointed to see so much FUD over here. I switched to atom from sublime 2 months back, mainly because its tooling for ES7(emmet, babel, eslint etc) just work

by kapv89 11y ago

Disappointed to see so much FUD over here. I switched to atom from sublime 2 months back, mainly because its tooling for ES7(emmet, babel, eslint etc) just works. And the editor is much more accessible to me than sublime. Btw, I develop on an 14'' i3 3rd gen, 8gig, no-ssd laptop, and I am able to do react-native dev, with the emulator running just fine

michaelmrose 11y ago
Are you sure its not just other peoples experience that doesn't match yours rather than FUD?
- kapv89 11y ago
  Are you sure its not FUD? I setup the dev team of a startup(in Delhi, India) I was consulting with with Atom for react and node dev few months back. These guys were provided pretty shitty, and pretty old, 4 gig ram laptops. And they used to screw up things which could've easily been resolved with in-text-editor linting. I got them running atom with emmet, babel and ESlint, and they are still using it without any issues. I have seen atom run reasonably well on really shitty machines. Its very hard for me to accept that all this complaining about its performance is not FUD.
  - ino 11y ago
    It runs badly on my 8gb 2013 MacBook Air, on a medium sized php+javascript project. I've been trying Atom every 3 months since it came out. Just a few plugins and Linting and is still very slow and I hate lag while typing. I don't have this problem with Sublime, for example, where typing is instant. Even eclipse and Android studio are more responsive when typing.
  - pikzen 11y ago
    It runs badly on my 16GB, i5 2500k desktop. Windows & Debian. 1GB RAM usage and a full CPU core is not acceptable for a text editor.
  - uncreative24 11y ago
    I suspect those who are experiencing high cpu usage while idling are running into weird bugs. It's only been 6 months since they released 1.0. It runs well enough on my laptop with a 4th gen i7, 8gb ram, ssd, running linux but cpu utilization is rather high. Scrolling inside a moderately sized file puts a 20-30% load on all 4 of my threads. If I enable on the fly linting, autocomplete features, minimap, and etc, it starts to add up. I've used vim, emacs, and sublime text and I've found that with my uses cases (mainly python development), atom ranks at the bottom of efficiency and performance (but highest in productivity). I consider myself a proponent of atom and it's currently my favorite editor, especially with vim-mode but it has it's drawbacks. It's just not a fair fight; comparing the performance/efficiency of atom to editors written in c/c++ doesn't make sense to me.

by kapv89 11y ago

michaelmrose 11y ago

Are you sure its not just other peoples experience that doesn't match yours rather than FUD?

kapv89 11y ago
Are you sure its not FUD? I setup the dev team of a startup(in Delhi, India) I was consulting with with Atom for react and node dev few months back. These guys were provided pretty shitty, and pretty old, 4 gig ram laptops. And they used to screw up things which could've easily been resolved with in-text-editor linting. I got them running atom with emmet, babel and ESlint, and they are still using it without any issues. I have seen atom run reasonably well on really shitty machines. Its very hard for me to accept that all this complaining about its performance is not FUD.
- ino 11y ago
  It runs badly on my 8gb 2013 MacBook Air, on a medium sized php+javascript project. I've been trying Atom every 3 months since it came out. Just a few plugins and Linting and is still very slow and I hate lag while typing. I don't have this problem with Sublime, for example, where typing is instant. Even eclipse and Android studio are more responsive when typing.
- pikzen 11y ago
  It runs badly on my 16GB, i5 2500k desktop. Windows & Debian. 1GB RAM usage and a full CPU core is not acceptable for a text editor.
- uncreative24 11y ago
  I suspect those who are experiencing high cpu usage while idling are running into weird bugs. It's only been 6 months since they released 1.0. It runs well enough on my laptop with a 4th gen i7, 8gb ram, ssd, running linux but cpu utilization is rather high. Scrolling inside a moderately sized file puts a 20-30% load on all 4 of my threads. If I enable on the fly linting, autocomplete features, minimap, and etc, it starts to add up. I've used vim, emacs, and sublime text and I've found that with my uses cases (mainly python development), atom ranks at the bottom of efficiency and performance (but highest in productivity). I consider myself a proponent of atom and it's currently my favorite editor, especially with vim-mode but it has it's drawbacks. It's just not a fair fight; comparing the performance/efficiency of atom to editors written in c/c++ doesn't make sense to me.