3 ms·
Ya I used to agree with you completely. I still do for the majority of pages out there. I recently learned of a counter example. There is a locally owned sport
by jmatt 17y ago
Ya I used to agree with you completely. I still do for the majority of pages out there.
I recently learned of a counter example. There is a locally owned sports bar and restaurant that has a very active group. Most of the members are fans of sports teams that are across country and the games play regularly at this bar. The owner is active in the group too and definitely encourages and responds to conversation. The other group I know that is relatively active has more or less the same characteristics. It's people who identify with the group but are otherwise disjoint - and this is the best way for them to casually communicate. I think it's safe to say this was the original intent of groups and pages. Celebrities and companies are just taking advantage it. Of course, I have a handful of pages on my facebook profile, so I guess I'm as guilty as anyone else. (I'm With COCO!)
EDIT: abusing -> taking advantage