3 ms·
When I tried it last time, maybe a year ago, I was quickly turned off by how uncustomisable it was, despite the claims. All I wanted was a non-blinking block c
by bhaak 11y ago
When I tried it last time, maybe a year ago, I was quickly turned off by how uncustomisable it was, despite the claims.
All I wanted was a non-blinking block cursor ...
Now I just found this https://github.com/olmokramer/atom-block-cursor https://github.com/olmokramer/atom-block-cursor
But more than 200 commits to support non-blinking block cursors? I think Atom is not for me.
- pvdebbe 11y ago:) I get you perfectly, but every exensible system usually has a couple of corners that are not that easily extended as indented. Design choices, tradeoffs or laziness usually involved.
- tokenizerrr 11y agoSo many of those commits are "updated readme", "updated changelog" and stuff like that. Scrolling through the log it's not uncomming to find 5 or 6 "updated readme" commits right after each other in that repository. It's not a good metric. Instead look at the 278 lines of code necessary to achieve it.
- akerro 11y agoThat's what happens when someone tries to write desktop application in JS :)
- krisdol 11y agoYou really can't please some people.