> Seems hard to justify using MIT licensed code in that case? It doesn't.. It's what MS essentially had prior to opensourcing .net proper. They had some parts

> Seems hard to justify using MIT licensed code in that case? It doesn't.. It's what MS essentially had prior to opensourcing .net proper. They had some parts of it the library that were free, and some parts that were hands-off or we'll sue you. It makes sense to try and lure people in at first with "free" and then scare them into buying licences if they ever manage to get big.