4 ms·

Pooh-pooh is the saying [0], which removes the fecal component from your statement. Otherwise, that's been my experience with GoPro as well. [0] http://gramma

Pooh-pooh is the saying [0], which removes the fecal component from your statement. Otherwise, that's been my experience with GoPro as well. [0] http://grammarist.com/usage/poo-pooh/ http://grammarist.com/usage/poo-pooh/ Edit: Downvote me all you want, it's the difference between literally taking a dump on something and figuratively doing so. Words matter. If that offends you, maybe you aren't as open to knowledge as you think.

wrsh07 11y ago
Silly thing to nit, off topic, etc. Also, since I see no reason why grammarist is more trustworthy than wiki, you're not even necessarily right: [from wiki] "A pooh-pooh (also styled as poo-poo)..."
- Domenic_S 11y ago
  I'm right. Did you look at the wiki reference? It's a book called "Seventeen Versions of Jewishness: 20 Examples" by a comedy/children's writer. More likely that example slipped by the editor.
- mattl 11y ago
  Which wiki?
giaour 11y ago
Good on you for not pooh-pooh-ing an errant "poo-poo." https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QeF1JO7Ki8E https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QeF1JO7Ki8E