3 ms·
It's also so much more biased and cranky, to the point where I would've kept the original. C'mon, did Marty Peretz shoot the author's dog?
by gyardley 11y ago
It's also so much more biased and cranky, to the point where I would've kept the original. C'mon, did Marty Peretz shoot the author's dog?
- dang 11y agoI didn't read the whole thing, but it didn't sound cranky to me. Biased, sure, but not tendentious, and with lots more information than the NYT piece. If people feel strongly about this we'll happily change it back though.