3 ms·
Are you seriously suggesting Airbus aircraft are more dangerous than Boeing due to automation? The (public) accident data show that they have comparable safety
by nether 11y ago
Are you seriously suggesting Airbus aircraft are more dangerous than Boeing due to automation? The (public) accident data show that they have comparable safety records across the board. Carriers aren't clamoring to Airbus for less automation. Flyers aren't gripped by fear when they see "A320" on their boarding passes. The manufacturers employ different philosophies on flight control, but it's not a clear shot that a human is always better. With cars, the general data suggest that automation leads to massive reduction in accidents. In every field there's some nostalgia and romanticizing over how when SHTF, only those with manual experience will be able to achieve anything. Then you have cases like the death of pilot of Michael Alsbury, which would have been prevented by very simple automated flight control checks. http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-ntsb-virgin-20150727-story.html http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-ntsb-virgin-20150727-s...
- 6stringmerc 11y agoNo, I'm seriously suggesting that some airlines prefer to purchase Airbus products because their advanced avionics and automation systems bridge a competency gap in order to maintain operations and growth at the expense of safety. Are you seriously suggesting a traveler of reasonable means will look at their ticket that says AirAsia on it and think they have made the best possible deicison?