4 ms·
Even if microsoft told, that doesn't mean we should automatically trust it. The could be wrong or lying. I would prefer source code, but someone will eventuall
by sqeaky 11y ago
Even if microsoft told, that doesn't mean we should automatically trust it. The could be wrong or lying.
I would prefer source code, but someone will eventually do packet captures to figure at least some of it out.
- Someone1234 11y agoGo ahead and provide evidence that they're wrong or lying. People have been drum beating this privacy stuff for over six months now. But they seem to lack specific evidence, so now I invite you to present it.
- DoubleMalt 11y agoIt would be easy to dispel the accusations by open sourcing windows [/troll]
- k33n 11y agoYou're the only one who has used the term "conspiracy" here. Again (for the 5th time you've been told) Microsoft has used exceptionally broad terminology to describe what data they are collecting. Since you're the one drumming on about "evidence" for a "conspiracy theory", why don't you provide a definitive list of the exact data they are collecting?
- janpieterz 11y agoYou have no way of trusting any other company that releases closed systems either. Like iOS, or manufacturers Androids. You have to trust some institution at some point.
- sqeaky 11y agoThis is true, but microsoft has a particular history of malice few other companies can match.