If that's the only point you intended to make, then fine, say that. But you didn't. What you said was that anyone looking for a no-cost option for Qt now has

If that's the only point you intended to make, then fine, say that. But you didn't. What you said was that anyone looking for a no-cost option for Qt now has to use GPLv3, or they can pay for a commercial license (and then complain about getting downvoted). These are not the same thing. The former is something to have a discussion about. The latter is verifiably untrue, and has massively wasted time for someone not wanting to see the lie get repeated or go uncorrected.