3 ms·
I love this explainer on TNRmageddon and especially this note: http://www.vox.com/2016/1/12/10756786/tnr-meltdown-tnrmageddon http://www.vox.com/2016/1/12/1075
by dankohn1 11y ago
I love this explainer on TNRmageddon and especially this note:
http://www.vox.com/2016/1/12/10756786/tnr-meltdown-tnrmageddon http://www.vox.com/2016/1/12/10756786/tnr-meltdown-tnrmagedd...
"A note on conflicts of interest
The world of Washington, DC-based magazines and websites is incredibly incestuous, so I have no way of writing about this without stepping all over too many conflicts of interest to count.
But some noteworthy ones include the fact that I applied for a job with the Peter Beinart–era TNR and didn't get it after a disastrous job interview. I was recruited for jobs in both the first and second Foer eras. I used to work closely with Richard Just (who was editor between Foer stints) before he worked at TNR. I dated a TNR staffer for a while, was roommates with Spencer Ackerman at the time Foer fired him from TNR, and am very close friends with a current staffer at TNR. I also lived in the same dorm with Hughes for a year in college.
All of which is to say that while my coverage of this can hardly be objective, it's also pretty well-informed."
- dang 11y agoWow, that article is like a magnum opus on this. Since it's so much more informative, we changed the URL to that from http://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/12/business/media/chris-hughes-selling-the-new-republic.html http://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/12/business/media/chris-hughe....
- gyardley 11y agoIt's also so much more biased and cranky, to the point where I would've kept the original. C'mon, did Marty Peretz shoot the author's dog?
- dang 11y agoI didn't read the whole thing, but it didn't sound cranky to me. Biased, sure, but not tendentious, and with lots more information than the NYT piece. If people feel strongly about this we'll happily change it back though.