My argument still stands. This is only matters if you can argue that substantial numbers of people say "OMG it has Flash, _now_ definitely want one". The quest

My argument still stands. This is only matters if you can argue that substantial numbers of people say "OMG it has Flash, _now_ definitely want one". The question is one of intent. Did they want to intentionally want to make people believe the iPad has flash, or did they just want to have the NYT site look good/un-broken in the ad? This complaint is making a mountain out of a molehill.