> - What's with the whole "language" and "compiler" distinctions no one cares about? People care about distiguishing C89 and C99 from GCC and clang and their v

> - What's with the whole "language" and "compiler" distinctions no one cares about? People care about distiguishing C89 and C99 from GCC and clang and their versions. If we don't want to block the road to future compilers for the same language (and we had other compilers in the past, they just aren't maintained anymore), we'd better be careful to distinguish them. > - Why is the first stable release of the compiler not optimized to the max? Because it's the first stable release, not the last. We expect to improve still.