4 ms·
No breaking change was required for that. :) The PyPy guys have removed the GIL with existing Python2 code.[0] The CPython core dev team doesn't want to work th
by BuckRogers 11y ago
No breaking change was required for that. :) The PyPy guys have removed the GIL with existing Python2 code.[0] The CPython core dev team doesn't want to work that hard though- they've just created a lot of needless work for others with their decisions.
You're right though, unless someone takes on the mantle of CPython2, we're looking at being forced to move to 3 or find something else. I personally think '16/'17 will be the year(s) of Swift. With the Perfect server-side Swift framework[1], and more sure to come, it's very intriguing.
I'm a pretty conservative user myself, and dislike churn and feature bloat so I'm also fairly attracted to Go. I'm not suggesting that's Swift by any means. Go promised no breaking changes for a long time so it's a good choice to write long-lived software in (and who knows what will and won't end up being long-lived so we should always assume the latter).
[0]http://morepypy.blogspot.com/2015/03/pypy-stm-251-released.html http://morepypy.blogspot.com/2015/03/pypy-stm-251-released.h...
[1]http://perfect.org/ http://perfect.org/
- Nrpf 11y agoJulia