3 ms·
I don't mind. I went with self hosting. I found a supplier which had their own scalable infrastructure. That's a little vague. By "self-hosting" you mean Li
by sbierwagen 11y ago
I don't mind. I went with self hosting. I found a supplier
which had their own scalable infrastructure.
That's a little vague. By "self-hosting" you mean Linux VMs, like EC2, right, or something more abstracted than that? What supplier?
- no1youknowz 11y agoSorry, I just updated the post. I meant dedicated hosting. So bare-metal machines. If you want to know the supplier. They are called Mojohost. http://www.mojohost.com/ http://www.mojohost.com/
- toomuchtodo 11y agoWhen you need performance, bare metal is always the way to go.
- matt_wulfeck 11y agoThis saying holds such little value for so many engineers. They want uptime, ease of management, and security. Most people aren't worried about squeezing another 3% performance out of thei servers. In fact I would say the slice-and-dice nature of VMs allows for better overall capacity usage because of over provisioning of resources. How many apps do you know that hover at 0.07 load all day long?
- toomuchtodo 11y agoOkay, how's this: "If you're willing to pay up to a 40% premium for the features cloud providers provide, pay them. If not, go bare metal."
- matt_wulfeck 11y agoFair enough.
- joe563323 11y agoAll they say is it costs 125$. 125$ for what ? They do not mention the specs of the hardware in their website.