So let me see if I follow the definition of append there, using Fexl notation which doesn't use pattern matching (all data items such as lists are just function

So let me see if I follow the definition of append there, using Fexl notation which doesn't use pattern matching (all data items such as lists are just functions applied normally). Here's the fold function: \fold = (\func\val\list list val \head\tail func head (fold func val tail)) And here's the traditional definition of append, not using fold: \append = (\xs\ys xs ys \head\tail cons head (append tail ys)) The article alleges that append can be defined in terms of fold as: \append = (\xs\ys fold cons ys xs) So now I'll try to prove the equivalence as follows. : append xs ys = fold cons ys xs = (\func\val\list list val \head\tail func head (fold func val tail)) cons ys xs = \func=cons \val=ys \list=xs list val \head\tail func head (fold func val tail) = xs ys \head\tail cons head (fold cons ys tail) = xs ys \head\tail cons head (append tail ys) Looks right!