Does that mean you assume reducing population to be easy/easier? Increasing our habitat isn't simple. But it at least is likely to get more feasible over time.

Does that mean you assume reducing population to be easy/easier? Increasing our habitat isn't simple. But it at least is likely to get more feasible over time. While reducing population seems to be the opposite of our 'nature' (not that we aren't able to go against that) and it requires the cooperation of basically everyone. Which isn't required by the former. Cooperation seems to get [insert mathematical function] harder when more people are involved. Sidenote: expansion would of course not exclude taking care of existing habitats.